Lituanistica https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica <p>The journal publishes original research papers, book reviews, annotations, and sources in history, archaeology, linguistics, literature, and ethnology. Contributions are accepted in English and Lithuanian.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> en-US lituanistica@gmail.com (Editorial Secretary) leidyba@lma.lt (Publishing Department of the Lithuanian Academy of Sciences) Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0300 OJS 3.1.2.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Title https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6909 Copyright (c) https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6909 Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0300 Contents https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6911 Copyright (c) https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6911 Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0300 Appeal of the Commission of the USSR MVD and the USSR General Prosecutor’s Office to the Insurgent Prisoners of the Kengir Camp https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6904 <p>The armed uprising in Kengir in Steplag (16 May&nbsp;– 26 June 1954) was one of the&nbsp;most prominent and dramatic uprisings of political prisoners in the&nbsp;Gulag and represented the&nbsp;culmination of the&nbsp;crisis in the&nbsp;camp administration system. Ukrainians and Lithuanians played the&nbsp;most significant role in the&nbsp;Kengir uprising as initiators, organisers, and active participants (former members of anti-Soviet resistance predominated: partisans, couriers, and supporters), most of whom had been sentenced to long prison terms. The&nbsp;Lithuanian lawyer Juozas Kondratas was one of the&nbsp;principal leaders of the&nbsp;uprising. According to incomplete data, six Lithuanians were killed and fourteen wounded during the&nbsp;suppression of the&nbsp;uprising.<br>The document published here&nbsp;– a&nbsp;previously unpublished record of the&nbsp;repressive structures (an appeal of the&nbsp;commission of the&nbsp;USSR MVD and the&nbsp;USSR General Prosecutor’s Office to the&nbsp;insurgent prisoners of the&nbsp;Kengir camp)&nbsp;– is an informative and significant source that will help specialists study the&nbsp;Steplag uprising. The&nbsp;document was compiled on 20 June 1954 [not earlier], when negotiations between the&nbsp;government commission and the&nbsp;prisoners’ representatives had reached a&nbsp;deadlock. The&nbsp;compilers of the&nbsp;source (Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs of the&nbsp;USSR Sergei Yegorov, Head of the&nbsp;Gulag Ivan Dolgikh, his deputy Viktor Bochkov, and Deputy Prosecutor General of the&nbsp;USSR Afanasy Vavilov) were the&nbsp;principal members of the&nbsp;Soviet government commission authorised to conduct negotiations with the&nbsp;Kengir rebels and the&nbsp;organisers of the&nbsp;suppression of the&nbsp;uprising.<br>The document reveals not only how the&nbsp;leaders of the&nbsp;USSR MVD and the&nbsp;Gulag interpreted the&nbsp;uprising and what they focused their attention on, but also the&nbsp;arsenal of psychological and mental influence (manipulation of facts, prisoners’ emotions, the&nbsp;instinct of survival, etc.) they used in their attempt to end the&nbsp;prisoners’ ‘mass disobedience’.</p> Mindaugas Pocius Copyright (c) https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6904 Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0300 Orthographic Representation of Lithuanian Personal Names with the Endings -as, -a, and -is in Fourteenth-Century German Historical Sources https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6905 <p>The recording of Lithuanian personal names in historical sources and their adaptation into foreign languages have been widely investigated. However, the&nbsp;scope and depth of existing research remain uneven across historical periods and the&nbsp;empirical material analysed. Lithuanian proper names, especially personal names documented in German and Latin sources, have received comparatively less systematic attention. Lithuanian names recorded in German historiography and in the&nbsp;documents of the&nbsp;Teutonic Order in the&nbsp;fourteenth century represent some of the&nbsp;earliest attestations of the&nbsp;Lithuanian anthroponymic corpus. This article seeks to contribute to the&nbsp;study of historical Lithuanian personal names by introducing previously unanalysed material, thereby expanding our understanding of how the&nbsp;spoken Lithuanian name inventory was adapted in fourteenth-century foreign-language written sources.<br>The&nbsp;analysis demonstrates that in German and Latin records of the&nbsp;period, contemporary Lithuanian personal names ending in -as were consistently altered, with the&nbsp;original ending replaced by -e. The&nbsp;endings -a and -is, by contrast, were either preserved or similarly modified to -e. These patterns reveal systematic tendencies in the&nbsp;orthographic and morphological adaptation of Lithuanian names in medieval German and Latin texts.</p> Darius Ivoška Copyright (c) https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6905 Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0300 Lithuanians in Twentieth-Century Latvia: Their Representation in Oral History Sources https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6906 <p>The article examines some aspects of the&nbsp;self-awareness of the&nbsp;Lithuanians born in the&nbsp;1920s and the&nbsp;1930s and living in Latvia, which are reflected in their life stories. The&nbsp;interviews were recorded during field research by the&nbsp;Daugavpils University Oral History Centre in south-eastern Latvia. These oral history sources reflect some features of the&nbsp;narrators’ identity: Lithuanian ethnicity (Lithuanian language skills, everyday life habits, Catholicism, etc.) and connection with Latvia (understanding of Latvian history and some characteristics of historical consciousness, attitude towards Latvians). The&nbsp;analysis of the&nbsp;sources reveals that Lithuanian ethnicity is not the&nbsp;determining feature of the&nbsp;self-awareness of the&nbsp;studied group. Certain common value orientations and features of Latvian national identity are observed, which are characteristic of the&nbsp;majority of Latvian residents of the&nbsp;said generation. Despite a&nbsp;certain degree of ‘otherness’, Lithuanians in south-eastern Latvia perceived themselves as members of the&nbsp;local society.</p> Irēna Saleniece Copyright (c) https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6906 Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0300 Transformation of Attitudes Toward Male (Non-) Participation in the Childbirth Process in Lithuania During the Late Twentieth and the Early Twenty-First Centuries https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6907 <p>The article examines the&nbsp;transformation of male (non)participation in the&nbsp;childbirth process. The&nbsp;scarcity of ethnological research analysing men’s (non-)involvement in childbirth in Lithuania prompted an ethnographic field study, which was conducted from the&nbsp;late twentieth to the&nbsp;early twenty-first century. The&nbsp;aim was to investigate how male (non-)participation in childbirth evolved and what roles men assumed during the&nbsp;birth process. Historical sources and findings from ethnological, sociological, psychological, biomedical, and gender studies indicate that both male (non-)participation and men’s actions during childbirth shifted in accordance with cultural, historical, and social contexts. At the&nbsp;beginning of the&nbsp;twenty-first century, the&nbsp;topic of men’s involvement in the&nbsp;birth of a&nbsp;child (i.e., participation in childbirth) was receiving increasing scholarly attention. An ethnographic study conducted between 2023 and 2025 revealed that men are becoming more active participants in the&nbsp;childbirth process. Within a&nbsp;broader historical context, a&nbsp;gradual shift can be observed: from culturally constrained (non-)involvement, when men were physically absent from childbirth or participated only in exceptional cases and still played significant roles in ensuring protection, caregiving, and maintaining the&nbsp;domestic environment, to more active, institutionally encouraged engagement. This engagement increasingly includes direct participation in childbirth and reflects a&nbsp;broader transition toward shared parental responsibilities. Male involvement in childbirth is negotiated at the&nbsp;family level, where decision-making is shaped by the&nbsp;expectations and mutual agreement of both partners.</p> Raimonda Rauluševičienė Copyright (c) https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6907 Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0300 Polarisation of Authenticity in the Search for Individuality Among Contemporary Women in Western and Central Lithuania https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6908 <p>The article analyses how women in western and central Lithuania in the&nbsp;twenty-first century construct their individuality through the&nbsp;concept of authenticity and everyday practices of body and beauty. Authenticity is understood as a&nbsp;dynamic process that takes place between the&nbsp;inner sense of self and external social norms and as a&nbsp;requirement of contemporary culture to constantly work on oneself. The&nbsp;study shows that the&nbsp;experiences of women in western and central Lithuania are shaped in a&nbsp;polarised cultural context. On the&nbsp;one hand, there is an emphasis on self-acceptance, body diversity, and the&nbsp;right to be oneself. On the&nbsp;other hand, the&nbsp;beauty industry, social networks, and visual culture create clear aesthetic and behavioural standards that limit this declared freedom. As a&nbsp;result, women’s identity is shaped by a&nbsp;constant tension between free choice and structural constraints imposed by the&nbsp;media, family expectations, the&nbsp;professional environment, and cultural stereotypes. Empirical survey data reveal that the&nbsp;discourse of authenticity has an ambiguous effect: it empowers women by promoting self-esteem and individuality on the&nbsp;one hand but disciplines them by determining what a&nbsp;‘proper’ woman should be like&nbsp;–&nbsp;psychologically stable, aesthetically moderate, tidy, and socially acceptable&nbsp;–&nbsp;on the&nbsp;other hand. These two aspects usually do not operate separately; rather, they function simultaneously and form a&nbsp;subtle control mechanism. In the&nbsp;given context, the&nbsp;search for individuality by contemporary women is a&nbsp;consistent process comprised of several related phases, which is never completely finished. Here authenticity functions not only as a&nbsp;personal value but also as a&nbsp;cultural norm that shapes women’s self-awareness and the&nbsp;logic of beauty practices. The&nbsp;study shows that the&nbsp;polarisation between authenticity as liberation and authenticity as a&nbsp;norm is one of the&nbsp;essential features of contemporary culture that shapes the&nbsp;self-perception and beauty practices of women in western and central Lithuania.</p> Rasa Balsevičienė Copyright (c) https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6908 Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0300 The Court Book of the Subcamerarius of the Kaunas District (1619–1624) https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6910 Copyright (c) https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/lituanistica/article/view/6910 Tue, 14 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0300